Syllogisms to recap

I realize that many bloggers and blog readers (myself included) have the attention span of tsetse flies. For that reason I have broken down that last post into easily digestible nuggets. For clarification of any of the premises in these arguments, I'm afraid you'll need to read the longer portion of the blog.

For those who are unfamiliar with the concept, a syllogism is the traditional basis of a logical argument. The way to argue against syllogisms is to find the fault in the logic, also known as the "Logical Fallacy." I will remove any syllogism in which someone finds a logical fallacy.

Secret spying is against US law
President Bush authorized secret spying
President Bush violated US law

The president is charged by the US Constitution with enforcing US law
President Bush violated US law
President Bush does not uphold the US Constitution


The Geneva Conventions are part of a treaty
The Bush administration does not to abide by these conventions
The Bush Administration does not abide by treaties

Treaties are viewed as US law by the US Constitution
President Bush does not abide by treaties
President Bush does not enforce US law

The president is charged by the US Constitution with enforcing US law
President Bush does not enforce US law
President Bush does not uphold the US Constitution

When a president does not uphold the US Constitution, they are required to be impeached
President Bush does not uphold the constitution
President Bush is required to be impeached

The US Constitution is the basis of the United States
US patriots support the United States
US patriots support the US Constitution

US patriots support the US Constitution
President Bush does not support the US Constitution
President Bush is not a US Patriot

It is never too late to impeach and remove from office the president and vice president.